Private Resorts
Register/Series/Public Rights Inside Private Ground
39 resorts · editorial series

Public Rights Inside Private Ground

Beaches that are public by law, a trail older than the estate, a settlement that gave two shores back. Where the boundary stops at somebody else's right.

39 records where somebody else holds a right inside the boundary — by statute, by settlement, by ancient use or by the simple fact that the neighbours were there first. The series exists because the phrase private beach turned out to mean at least four different things.

The clearest case is Aman Sveti Stefan, closed for five years over access to the beaches opposite its island and reopened in 2026 under a settlement with the Montenegrin state: two of three shores public, one reserved for guests, a permanent building ban in the park and a share of profits to the state. A boundary written by agreement rather than drawn by an owner.

The rest are quieter and just as real. Thai law makes every beach public, so Amanpuri's sand is empty only because the ways onto it run through hotels. Hawaii guarantees shoreline access and an old trail crosses Hualalai. Mexico's federal maritime zone means Esencia holds the land behind the sand. Anguilla does not allow Cap Juluca to hold its bay. A public path crosses Amandari to three shrines at the river. At NIHI the beach is where the villages fish, wash ponies and race horses — and the resort says so on its own pages.

Nothing here is a criticism. A right of way is not a defect in an estate; it is a fact about it, and an estate that acknowledges one is more trustworthy than an estate that prints the word private over it.